Denture cream maker agrees to remove zinc

GlaxoSmithKline said Thursday it Will remove zinc from its denture cream after reports that excessive use over many years can cause neurological damage and blood problems in consumers.

The British manufacturer will stop making and marketing Super Poligrip Original, Ultra Fresh and Extra Care products in the U.S. The company plans to reformulate the creams without zinc.

The company said that the products are safe when used as directed but that some patients use extra cream to help with ill-fitting dentures. Zinc is believed to help with adhesion.

Denture creams containing zinc were first approved by the Food and Drug Administration 15 years ago.

In 2008, researchers at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas described a possible link between denture cream zinc and nerve damage.

Glaxo’s voluntary action comes as hundreds of patient lawsuits are poised to go to trial, alleging that Poligrip caused nerve damage, leading to a loss of balance and loss of sensation in the hands and feet, leaving patients unable to walk.

“They made the right decision in the sense that it’s going to prevent the crippling of more people,” said attorney Andy Alonso of Waichman Alonso LLP. “But it’s too late for many of my clients, unfortunately.”

Alonso represents more than a hundred users of denture cream in Miami federal court, where several hundred lawsuits are being consolidated. He said about 30 million people in the U.S. wear dentures and use products like Poligrip

About Andrew Traub

Learn about Andrew Traub, founder of The Traub Law Office, P.C., and his dedication to helping Austin clients with accident and injury cases.

View all articles by Andrew Traub | Website

What Our Clients Say

hired Mr. Traub following a motor vehicle accident in which a driver ran a red light and t-boned and totaled my car. I was injured in several places, one of which was a significant concussion which rendered me unable to think clearly or deal with the stress of wrangling insurance companies and all the other mountains of details that must be dealt with in situations like these. From the beginning, he was caring first and foremost. He was patient with my repeated questions (my concussion left me unable to hang onto details, for about a month I'd have to ask and re-ask even the simplest of things). He took my case and got started right away. Thanks to working with him I was able to have access and referrals to medical care that would have been difficult for me to attain otherwise, as I am self-employed and without health insurance. I felt the wonderful feeling of peace of mind knowing that someone was in charge and on my case, being a very strong advocate for me, my recovery, and my well-being going forward. I know having that kind of trust was an asset in my being able to focus all my attention and energy on getting back to myself and my routines. I always had prompt responses to emails or phone calls, and to address the earlier comment that expressed having a negative experience in communicating, any "cross-examining" I experienced-- and it was only one conversation-- was only about trying to get all the information straight and clear for the purpose of keeping things on task, up to date and 100% accurate for my case. It was one conversation, and it was quickly and easily resolved. And it was all because he had my back. I would highly and enthusiastically recommend hiring him when in need.

5/ 5
Natalie Durkin

Contact Us

Contact Us
First
Last
Enter Email
Confirm Email
Please let us know what's on your mind. Have a question for us? Ask away.
Back To Top