While it is well known that driving while using cell phones can be dangerous, researchers at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration wanted to conduct a study in 2003 to assess the risk.

However, the agency did not approve of the study because they feared it would anger the Congress.  Not only that, but senior government officials chose not to make research that recommended that cell phones not be used while driving in public, until today.

Two consumer advocacy groups filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit for the documents and The New York Times published the documents on their website.

Dr. Jeffrey Runge, the former head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, said the Congress was telling his agency to not lobby states and to only gather safety information.  Runge decided not to publish the research to avoid angering the Congress.  Many don’t agree with Runge’s logic because no matter who it upsets, the information could save lives.

Clarence Ditlow, the director of the Center for Auto Safety, believes that it could be as dangerous as drunk driving.  Other information that has been withheld includes a draft letter speaking about how hands-free laws may not make calling and driving any safer because the actual conversation is what distracts drivers, from not holding the phone.  This information was petitioned for as well and the Los Angeles Times published it last year.

In 2002, highway safety researchers estimated that 955 deaths and 240,000 accidents were caused by cell phone use in vehicles.  Austin City Council Member Mike Martinez wants texting and driving to be illegal and for hands-free devices to be required if drivers are using their cell phones.

Research shows that motorists talking on a phone are four times as likely to crash as other drivers and are as likely to cause an accident as someone with a .08 blood alcohol content.  The research concluded that the use of cell phones has contributed to a large amount of accidents and fatalities and therefore they recommend that drivers avoid using their phones in any way unless it is an emergency.

Runge explains that he didn’t publish any of this because Congress had told him not to use its research to lobby states and he could lose the agency their financing.  Others said they didn’t publish the data because it was inconclusive and incomplete.  Runge further defends his decision saying that he feels that the issue is of the utmost importance and needs public attention.  He also says that he wanted to send the research to governors to sway them to pass hands-free laws.  However, Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta says he was unaware of anything of the sort going on and that the research never reached his desk.

Don’t Forget!

If you have any questions, you can call us at (512) 246-9191 or order our free car accident reports for consumers.

What Our Clients Say

This is a long review of our experience but the summary is: Andrew is by far the best Austin personal injury lawyer there is and we couldn't have found a better fit to represent us in our case! Andrew Traub represented us when we were hit at a school while dropping off our kids. My wife was ran over and ended up with severe leg scarring, I injured my jaw, and my son had severe emotional trauma. We spent months interviewing attorneys and decided Andrew Traub was the best injury attorney in Texas for our case. My wife's portion of the case wasn't hard to get max ($350,000) given her injuries; however, my son's emotional trauma was a VERY complex issue given it's not as easy to establish as physical injury. USAA (her insurance) and State Farm (our insurance) repeatedly denied any compensation to him. Andrew, using his expertise, was eventually able to get the pay max ($350,000) on his claim! My jaw injury was a physical injury but, ironically, USAA kept saying it was from my military service. In the end USAA did pay the policy limit ($100,000) for my jaw injury (our under-insurance had already paid out max). But, what I feel is just as important, is the way Andrew treated us. He was always keeping us in the loop and helping coordinate issues and care. He ensured we knew what to expect and rough estimates on time frames. He helped us set up a structured settlement where our son's money would almost double by the time he receives it. He was more than willing to help with the car damage side of the claim- which we had already don't but it would have been great not having to deal with it (we took our time interviewing attorneys given the complexity of the case).

5/ 5
R C - google

Contact Us

Contact Us
First
Last
Enter Email
Confirm Email
Please let us know what's on your mind. Have a question for us? Ask away.
Back To Top